Journal of Participatory Medicine
Co-production in research and healthcare, technology for patient empowerment and fostering partnership with clinicians.
Journal of Participatory Medicine is the official journal of the Society for Participatory Medicine.
Editor-in-Chief:
Amy Price, DPhil, Senior Research Scientist, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, USA
CiteScore 3.1 More information about CiteScore
Recent Articles

Health care is entering an era of unprecedented detection. Artificial intelligence (AI)–driven monitors and real-world data streams now identify clinical risks in minutes, promising a future of proactive, earlier intervention. While AI automation is often marketed as a tool to reduce administrative burden and allow health care providers to focus more on direct patient care, this unrealized potential currently stands in contrast to our reality. Building high-speed data “freeways” without “off-ramps” such as clinical staffing, workflow synergy, and the patient education required for meaningful response is like building a superhighway without well-engineered off-ramps to provide a safe way to get home, and this creates a dangerous paradox. Earlier detection without earlier care does not improve outcomes; it simply redistributes anxiety and extends the patient’s period of uncertainty. We argue that the “public as a sensor” is already signaling a systemic infrastructure gap. True safety in clinical AI isn’t found in more algorithmic guardrails, but in participatory co-design that ensures every digital alert has a viable human pathway to care and resolution. We must stop building high-speed roads that lead to a cliff edge of clinical unavailability and consider that while the technology is a feat of engineering, it’s our human architecture that makes it medicine.

People living in rural areas of British Columbia experience inequities in access to health care that impact health and well-being. Since time immemorial, Indigenous peoples have had a holistic understanding of health and wellness, and knowledge of healthful ways of living. However, in a rural context, Indigenous peoples contend not only with inequitable access to health care, but also with the historical and ongoing impacts of colonization. Virtual health innovations enable access to care closer to home, yet the need for diagnostic tests and essential medicines remains limited by supply chains. In this context, transport of medical supplies by drone offers a promising solution and has the potential to improve access to health care in rural and First Nations communities in British Columbia.

Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) experience disproportionately negative mental health outcomes, including rising suicide rates, and persistent barriers to culturally responsive care. Systemic racism, discrimination, and historical trauma contribute to mistrust of traditional mental health systems. Peer-led approaches that center lived experience and shared cultural identity may offer culturally responsive alternatives that foster emotional connection and trust.



Schools can play an important role in supporting child weight management, with evidence suggesting that school-based interventions can be effective, albeit with substantial variation. Part of this variation could reflect the different contexts in which interventions are implemented. Our previous work found that co-production of research and adopting a complex systems model of evidence can be transformative for understanding this context. However, less is known about how co-production helps prioritize elements for exploration or how we should assess the value of co-production in research development. This study addresses these gaps by co-producing a refined logic model (a graphical representation of a theory) of the contextual influencers on school-based weight management to support public health research and policymaking.

The integration of patient input into drug research & development (R&D) enables the production of medicines that better meet the needs of patients. While momentum for advancing the science of patient input has continued to grow, there remain a host of barriers to full implementation and integration of systematic approaches for collecting and using robust and meaningful patient input data to inform decision-making. To help address these barriers, the Advancing the Science of Patient Input Action Collaborative (the collaborative), an activity associated with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (National Academies) Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation, organized a multi-stakeholder endeavor to identify and address key barriers to implementation through a series of information-gathering efforts. The collaborative engaged a wide range of perspectives to seek out practical paths forward to better align drug discovery, development, and regulation with patient priorities for disease management and treatment. Collaborative participants focused on three overarching research priorities which, if effectively addressed, would help advance the science of patient input: 1) understanding the patient experience over the course of a given disease or medical condition, 2) capturing the patient perspectives and priorities on benefit-risk, and 3) incorporating patient input into clinical trial design and continuous improvement. Addressing these research priorities would help decision makers shift away from using patient input in particular cases or for one-off applications and towards the integration of patient input as part of everyday medical research and practice. Building upon existing guidances and strategies, and sharing lessons learned from use cases, a comprehensive patient input framework would serve as a critical step towards reimagining and enriching the science of patient input throughout the drug R&D process, enabling a future in which medicines more fully meet the needs of patients.

Stroke is a major cause of long-term disability, and upper extremity (UE) impairment frequently limits independence in activities of daily living (ADLs) and community participation. In Thailand, although acute stroke care has improved, continuity of rehabilitation in community settings remains uneven. Currently, there is limited empirical evidence identifying occupational therapy (OT) services and the barriers affecting service delivery in practice.

More than 50 million adults in the United States provide unpaid care to a family member. Caregiving is associated with high rates of depression, anxiety, social isolation, financial strain, and physical exhaustion. Elevated caregiver distress has also been linked to poorer patient outcomes, including worse symptom control, lower adherence to treatment, and increased health care use. Despite this well-documented burden, most research and intervention efforts focus on caregivers once illness or disability is already advanced and strain is fully present. Far less attention has been given to anticipatory caregiving, the emotional and relational adjustments that begin before clear functional decline. As aging parents grow more frail, adult children often confront uncertainty, shifting roles, and the gradual loss of independence long before hands-on care is required. This period may be marked by vigilance, grief, and existential distress, yet it remains largely unaddressed in the literature. This perspective examines anticipatory caregiving through clinical reflection and personal narrative, highlighting the need to recognize and support caregivers earlier in the trajectory of aging, before crisis defines the experience.

Digital phenotyping offers unprecedented opportunities for capturing real-time mental health data through smartphones, yet translating this data into clinically actionable insights remains challenging. While smartphones can generate nearly one million data points per patient per day, health care systems have struggled to incorporate even basic ecological momentary assessment data into routine care workflows.

Maternal health during the perinatal period is a global public health priority. While antenatal education is widely implemented, conventional lecture-based models often fail to achieve sustained behavior change. Innovative approaches that integrate experiential learning with digital support may enhance maternal knowledge, self-management, and pregnancy outcomes.

Worldwide, there are an estimated 55 million people living with dementia, with an estimated cost to society of US $1.3 trillion a year. These numbers are predicted to rise, with the dementia population doubling every 20 years, reaching an estimated 152 million by 2050. There is currently no cure for dementia, with the condition having a significant impact on people’s independence and quality of life (QoL). It is therefore vital that people living with dementia are given the support that helps them to manage these impacts and optimizes their QoL. To do this, a more personalized and detailed understanding of a patient’s daily life is needed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have long been associated with significant benefits in other domains, though the use of PROMs in routine dementia care is lacking. Factors such as platform design, literacy, language proficiency, and physical and mental capability can all severely impact the ability of people living with dementia to complete PROMs routinely.












