Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Co-Design & Participatory Design (312) Digital Mental Health Interventions, e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (3200) Methods and New Tools in Mental Health Research (903) Psychotic Disorders (291) Participatory Design and Participatory Research (524)

Published on in Vol 17 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/80184, first published .
A hand rests on the shoulder of a person in a group therapy session.

The Design Rationale and Preliminary Evaluation of a Prototype Designed by People With Lived Experience of Psychosis and Professionals: Design Research Study

The Design Rationale and Preliminary Evaluation of a Prototype Designed by People With Lived Experience of Psychosis and Professionals: Design Research Study

Authors of this article:

Lars Veldmeijer1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Gijs Terlouw1 Author Orcid Image ;   Job Van 'T Veer1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jim Van Os3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nynke Boonstra1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Veldmeijer L, Batstra L, Van Os J. The DSM needs more than revision: five blind spots and a case for dialogical redesign. Psychological Medicine 2026;56 View
  2. Dominello A, Lu S, De Los Santos A, Murphy M, Clay‐Williams R, Cheek C. “There Was a Light Bulb Moment”: Using Persona Dyads to Empathise, Explore and Develop Person‐Centred Solutions in Mental Health Service Co‐Design. Health Expectations 2026;29(4) View