This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Patient Reported Measures and Outcomes in Participatory Medicine (32) Artificial Intelligence (1854) Decision Support for Health Professionals (1404) Clinical Information and Decision Making (1736) Clinical Communication, Electronic Consultation and Telehealth (707) User Needs and Competencies (399) Security and Privacy of mHealth and uHealth (151) Design, Usability, and Evaluation of Research Instruments, Scales, and Measures (74)

Published on in Vol 17 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/69564, first published .
Patient Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Focus Group Study for Diagnostic Communication and Tool Implementation

Patient Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Focus Group Study for Diagnostic Communication and Tool Implementation

Patient Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Focus Group Study for Diagnostic Communication and Tool Implementation

Authors of this article:

Garrett Foresman1 Author Orcid Image ;   Joshua Biro1 Author Orcid Image ;   Alberta Tran2 Author Orcid Image ;   Kate MacRae3 Author Orcid Image ;   Sadaf Kazi1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Laura Schubel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Adam Visconti3 Author Orcid Image ;   William Gallagher3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Kelly M Smith5, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Traber Giardina7, 8 Author Orcid Image ;   Helen Haskell9 Author Orcid Image ;   Kristen Miller1, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

Garrett Foresman   1 , BS ;   Joshua Biro   1 , PhD ;   Alberta Tran   2 , PhD ;   Kate MacRae   3 , BS ;   Sadaf Kazi   1, 3 , PhD ;   Laura Schubel   1 , MPH ;   Adam Visconti   3 , MPH, MD ;   William Gallagher   3, 4 , MD ;   Kelly M Smith   5, 6 , PhD ;   Traber Giardina   7, 8 , MSW, PhD ;   Helen Haskell   9 , MA ;   Kristen Miller   1, 3, 4 , MSPH, MSL, DPH

1 National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States

2 Institute for Quality and Safety, MedStar Health, Columbia, MD, United States

3 School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States

4 Center for Diagnostic Systems Safety, MedStar Health Research Institute, MedStar Health, Columbia, MD, United States

5 University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

6 Toronto East General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

7 Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, United States

8 Section of Health Services Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States

9 Mothers Against Medical Error, Columbia, SC, United States

Corresponding Author: