Published on in Vol 12 , No 1 (2020) :Jan-Mar

The Participatory Zeitgeist in Health Care: It is Time for a Science of Participation

The Participatory Zeitgeist in Health Care: It is Time for a Science of Participation

The Participatory Zeitgeist in Health Care: It is Time for a Science of Participation

Authors of this article:

Victoria Jane Palmer 1 Author Orcid Image

Journals

  1. Cameron J, Humphreys C, Kothari A, Hegarty K. Exploring the knowledge translation of domestic violence research: A literature review. Health & Social Care in the Community 2020;28(6):1898 View
  2. Wale J, Thomas S, Hamerlijnck D, Hollander R. Patients and public are important stakeholders in health technology assessment but the level of involvement is low – a call to action. Research Involvement and Engagement 2021;7(1) View
  3. Lindblom S, Flink M, Elf M, Laska A, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals. Health Expectations 2021;24(3):905 View
  4. Casey M, Coghlan D, Carroll Á, Stokes D, Roberts K, Hynes G. Application of action research in the field of healthcare: a scoping review protocol. HRB Open Research 2021;4:46 View
  5. Barry J, Monahan C, Ferguson S, Lee K, Kelly R, Monahan M, Murphy R, Gibbons P, Higgins A. “I came, I saw, I conquered”: reflections on participating in a PhotoVoice project. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice 2021;16(4):257 View
  6. Casey M, Coghlan D, Carroll Á, Stokes D, Roberts K, Hynes G. Application of action research in the field of healthcare: a scoping review protocol. HRB Open Research 2021;4:46 View
  7. Casey M, Coghlan D, Carroll A, Stokes D. Is Action Research just about telling a good story?. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2022;78(3) View
  8. Lewis R, Boydell N, Blake C, Clarke Z, Kernaghan K, McMellon C. Involving young people in sexual health research and service improvement: conceptual analysis of patient and public involvement (PPI) in three projects. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 2022:bmjsrh-2022-201611 View
  9. Rajamani G, Rodriguez Espinosa P, Rosas L. Intersection of Health Informatics Tools and Community Engagement in Health-Related Research to Reduce Health Inequities: Scoping Review. Journal of Participatory Medicine 2021;13(3):e30062 View
  10. Hope A, Munro C. Liberty, Justice, and Intensive Care Unit Recovery. American Journal of Critical Care 2022;31(6):438 View
  11. Heyen N, Gardecki J, Eidt-Koch D, Schlangen M, Pauly S, Eickmeier O, Wagner T, Bratan T. Patient Science: Citizen Science Involving Chronically Ill People as Co-Researchers. Journal of Participatory Research Methods 2022;3(1) View
  12. KARAMAN Ş, KARAÇAY Ö, DİZDAR Y. Evaluation of DNA versus collagen perception in scientific articles examining cancer chemotherapy: Implication for collagen-based approaches. Phoenix Medical Journal 2022 View
  13. Marks L, Laird Y, Trevena H, Smith B, Rowbotham S. A Scoping Review of Citizen Science Approaches in Chronic Disease Prevention. Frontiers in Public Health 2022;10 View
  14. Franchini M, Salvatori M, Denoth F, Molinaro S, Pieroni S. Participation in Low Back Pain Management: It Is Time for the To-Be Scenarios in Digital Public Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(13):7805 View
  15. Miller E, Zelenko O. The Caregiving Journey: Arts-Based Methods as Tools for Participatory Co-Design of Health Technologies. Social Sciences 2022;11(9):396 View
  16. Hlongwa P, Rispel L. Coproduction in the management of individuals with cleft lip and palate in South Africa: the Ekhaya Lethu model. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2021;33(Supplement_2):ii33 View
  17. Schemer L, Hess C, Van Orden A, Birnie K, Harrison L, Glombiewski J, Simons L. Enhancing Exposure Treatment for Youths With Chronic Pain: Co-design and Qualitative Approach. Journal of Participatory Medicine 2023;15:e41292 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Visciola M. Sustainable Innovation. View