This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Opinion: Viewpoints, Columns, and Perspectives (9)

Published on in Vol 12, No 1 (2020): Jan-Mar

The Participatory Zeitgeist in Health Care: It is Time for a Science of Participation

The Participatory Zeitgeist in Health Care: It is Time for a Science of Participation

The Participatory Zeitgeist in Health Care: It is Time for a Science of Participation

Authors of this article:

Victoria Jane Palmer1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (30) Tweetations (41) Metrics

Journals

  1. Cameron J, Humphreys C, Kothari A, Hegarty K. Exploring the knowledge translation of domestic violence research: A literature review. Health & Social Care in the Community 2020;28(6):1898 View
  2. Wale J, Thomas S, Hamerlijnck D, Hollander R. Patients and public are important stakeholders in health technology assessment but the level of involvement is low – a call to action. Research Involvement and Engagement 2021;7(1) View
  3. Lindblom S, Flink M, Elf M, Laska A, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals. Health Expectations 2021;24(3):905 View
  4. Casey M, Coghlan D, Carroll Á, Stokes D, Roberts K, Hynes G. Application of action research in the field of healthcare: a scoping review protocol. HRB Open Research 2021;4:46 View
  5. Barry J, Monahan C, Ferguson S, Lee K, Kelly R, Monahan M, Murphy R, Gibbons P, Higgins A. “I came, I saw, I conquered”: reflections on participating in a PhotoVoice project. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice 2021;16(4):257 View
  6. Casey M, Coghlan D, Carroll Á, Stokes D, Roberts K, Hynes G. Application of action research in the field of healthcare: a scoping review protocol. HRB Open Research 2021;4:46 View
  7. Casey M, Coghlan D, Carroll A, Stokes D. Is Action Research just about telling a good story?. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2022;78(3) View
  8. Lewis R, Boydell N, Blake C, Clarke Z, Kernaghan K, McMellon C. Involving young people in sexual health research and service improvement: conceptual analysis of patient and public involvement (PPI) in three projects. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 2023;49(2):76 View
  9. Rajamani G, Rodriguez Espinosa P, Rosas L. Intersection of Health Informatics Tools and Community Engagement in Health-Related Research to Reduce Health Inequities: Scoping Review. Journal of Participatory Medicine 2021;13(3):e30062 View
  10. Hope A, Munro C. Liberty, Justice, and Intensive Care Unit Recovery. American Journal of Critical Care 2022;31(6):438 View
  11. Heyen N, Gardecki J, Eidt-Koch D, Schlangen M, Pauly S, Eickmeier O, Wagner T, Bratan T. Patient Science: Citizen Science Involving Chronically Ill People as Co-Researchers. Journal of Participatory Research Methods 2022;3(1) View
  12. KARAMAN Ş, KARAÇAY Ö, DİZDAR Y. Evaluation of DNA Versus Collagen Perception in Scientific Articles Examining Cancer Chemotherapy: Implication for Collagen-Based Approaches. Phoenix Medical Journal 2022;4(1):27 View
  13. Marks L, Laird Y, Trevena H, Smith B, Rowbotham S. A Scoping Review of Citizen Science Approaches in Chronic Disease Prevention. Frontiers in Public Health 2022;10 View
  14. Franchini M, Salvatori M, Denoth F, Molinaro S, Pieroni S. Participation in Low Back Pain Management: It Is Time for the To-Be Scenarios in Digital Public Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(13):7805 View
  15. Miller E, Zelenko O. The Caregiving Journey: Arts-Based Methods as Tools for Participatory Co-Design of Health Technologies. Social Sciences 2022;11(9):396 View
  16. Hlongwa P, Rispel L. Coproduction in the management of individuals with cleft lip and palate in South Africa: the Ekhaya Lethu model. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2021;33(Supplement_2):ii33 View
  17. Schemer L, Hess C, Van Orden A, Birnie K, Harrison L, Glombiewski J, Simons L. Enhancing Exposure Treatment for Youths With Chronic Pain: Co-design and Qualitative Approach. Journal of Participatory Medicine 2023;15:e41292 View
  18. Da Mosto D, Vallerani S, Kokkinidis G, Checchi M, Giaimo S, Adami E, Mammana L. Building communities of health: the experience of European social clinics. Community Development Journal 2023;58(4):595 View
  19. Fitzpatrick S, Lamb H, Stewart E, Gulliver A, Morse A, Giugni M, Banfield M. Co‐ideation and co‐design in co‐creation research: Reflections from the ‘Co‐Creating Safe Spaces’ project. Health Expectations 2023;26(4):1738 View
  20. Foley K, Lunnay B, Kevin C, Ward P. Developing a Women's Thought Collective methodology for health research: The roles and responsibilities of researchers in the reflexive co‐production of knowledge. Health Expectations 2023;26(5):1954 View
  21. Nordin A, Kjellstrom S, Robert G, Masterson D, Areskoug Josefsson K. Measurement and outcomes of co-production in health and social care: a systematic review of empirical studies. BMJ Open 2023;13(9):e073808 View
  22. Palmer V, Bibb J, Lewis M, Densley K, Kritharidis R, Dettmann E, Sheehan P, Daniell A, Harding B, Schipp T, Dost N, McDonald G. A co-design living labs philosophy of practice for end-to-end research design to translation with people with lived-experience of mental ill-health and carer/family and kinship groups. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  23. Woods S, Oldenburg J, van Leeuwen D, Sarasohn-Kahn J, Hudson M. An Extraordinary Voice Expressed Through Humor: A Tribute to Casey Quinlan. Journal of Participatory Medicine 2023;15:e54527 View
  24. Bogaert K, Regge M, Vermassen F, Eeckloo K. Engaging healthcare professionals and patient representatives in the development of a quality model for hospitals: a mixed-method study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2024;36(1) View
  25. Robertson C, Hibberd C, Shepherd A, Johnston G. How a National Organization Works in Partnership With People Who Have Lived Experience in Mental Health Improvement Programs: Protocol for an Exploratory Case Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2024;13:e51779 View
  26. Saut A, Ho L, Berssaneti F. Dealing with intervening factors in the patient engagement. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2024 View
  27. Grice-Jackson T, Rogers I, Ford E, Dickinson R, Frere-Smith K, Goddard K, Silver L, Topham C, Nahar P, Musinguzi G, Bastiaens H, Van Marwijk H. A community health worker led approach to cardiovascular disease prevention in the UK—SPICES-Sussex (scaling-up packages of interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention in selected sites in Europe and Sub-saharan Africa): an implementation research project. Frontiers in Health Services 2024;4 View
  28. Thorburn K, Waks S, Aadam B, Fisher K, Spooner C, Harris M. Creating the conditions for collaborative decision-making in co-design. CoDesign 2024:1 View
  29. Harst L, Haase T, Tesch F, Rüthrich L, Kösters M, Schmitt J, Chen T. Rationale and study protocol of a regional health panel in Saxony, Germany (GEPASA). PLOS ONE 2024;19(11):e0310656 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Visciola M. Sustainable Innovation. View