Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Currently submitted to: Journal of Participatory Medicine

Date Submitted: Jun 30, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 1, 2019 - Aug 26, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note “no longer under consideration” will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a “Peer-Review Me” button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed “version of record” (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Informational Practices of Post-acute Brain Injury Patients During Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study

  • Yamini Masterson; 
  • Erin Brady; 
  • Andrew Miller; 

ABSTRACT

Background:

The effects of brain injury, a structural damage or physiological disruption of brain function, last far beyond initial clinical treatment. Self-tracking and management technologies have potential to help individuals experiencing brain injury in their personal recovery – functioning at their best despite ongoing symptoms of illness. However, current self-tracking technologies may be unsuited for measuring the interconnected, non-linear ways in which brain injury manifests.

Objective:

This study aims to investigate the (1) current informational practices and sensemaking processes used by post-acute brain injury patients during personal recovery and (2) potential role of quality of life instruments in improving patient awareness of brain injury recovery, advocacy, and involvement in care used outside clinical context. Our objective is to explore means of improving awareness through reflection that lead to compensatory strategies by anticipating or recognizing the occurrence of a problem caused by impairment.

Methods:

We conducted a qualitative study and used essentialist/realist thematic analysis to analyze the data collected through semi-structured interviews and questionnaires, two weeks of structured data collection using brain injury specific health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument, quality of life after brain injury (QoLIBRI), and final interviews.

Results:

Informational practices of people with brain injury involve data collection, data synthesis, and obtaining and applying insights to their lifestyles. Participants collected data through structured tools such as spreadsheets, wearable devices, etc. but switched to unstructured tools such as journals, blogs etc. as changes in overall progress became more qualitative in nature. Although data collection helped participants summarize their progress better, lack of a conceptual understanding made it challenging to know what to monitor or communicate with clinicians. QoLIBRI served as an education tool in this scenario but was inadequate in facilitating reflection and sensemaking.

Conclusions:

Individuals with post-acute brain injury found the lack of conceptual understanding of recovery and tools for making sense of their health data as major impediments for tracking and being aware of their personal recovery. There is an urgent need for tools that focus on the holistic nature of recovery and improve the understanding of brain injury for all stakeholders involved through patient-generated health data.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Masterson Y, Brady E, Miller A

Informational Practices of Post-acute Brain Injury Patients During Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study

JMIR Preprints. 30/06/2019:15174

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.15174

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/15174


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.